Just to be clear about things. I loved Transformers. I know there are people who didn't like the first one, to those people I say... don't bother watching this one. If, like me, you thought that the first film was the most fun you've had in the cinema in years, then read on.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is set about two years after the first Michael Bay Transformers film and, as you can gather from the trailers, our friend Sam Witwicky is off to college. I'm not going tell you any more about the plot, personally I wouldn't even watch the new trailer because I thought it looked like they might reveal too much. This made it difficult to go to other movies, luckily that trailer has hardly any talking so staring at the floor worked quite well. But I digress. I seem to do that a lot.
Ok, when I walked out of the theatre after seeing this I was hyped up, I thought it was great. And it is great. If you love giant robot fighting - and I love giant robot fighting - then this is the film for you. But today I'm wondering, how great was it... really.
Well the effect are fantastic. Really amazing. I mean I've never seen anything like it. I thought the robot fighting moved slightly too quickly in the first film and I wasn't the only one. That has been slowed down a little bit in this one. The action still moves at a frenetic pace but you can actually see if it's an arm or a leg or whatever that the robots are bashing. So that's great.
Plotwise, I've seen a lot of moaning on the internet over the last day or two. I don't really know what they're complaining about. I didn't think it was particularly complicated, but in any case it doesn't really matter anyway. In fact I still don't know how they managed to have so much of a plot at all. There didn't seem to be time between the giant robots fighting. So that's grand really.
Where the film falls over slightly is on the characterisation. In the first film we had quite a few characters roaming around and they were all given a direction and a reason to be there. In this one it's as though Michael Bay decided that we already know the various characters that are back so he didn't need to deal with them. And it introduces very few new characters so there isn't really any attempt to build scenes around any connection between any of the characters at all. So that was a bit annoying. It didn't annoy me at the time, but it annoys me now.
It's not a perfect film and it was never going to have the same effect on me as the first one. There were no expectations going into that one, we didn't have any idea of how the movie should be. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen was always going to suffer from how people thought it should go, based on Transformers, and it's not exactly fair to judge it through the same eyes.
I gave the film a 9.5 on Twitter straight after but I'm going to drop that a bit to an 8.5/10. I'll round that up to a 9 on IMDb though. I had a great time watching it; the action scenes are absolutely fantastic. Could it have been better? Yes. On the other hand it could have been a lot worse and, while I have focused on merits of the action, there were some genuinely good "normal" scenes as well. In fact it's a lot funnier than the first one and I welcomed that.
I have to throw it in really as I'm sure there are people who want to know... How does it compare to J.J. Abrams Star Trek. Well... I did love Star Trek and if I recall correctly I said almost exactly the same thing about the criticisms of its plot. It's kind of hard for me to compare them. Star Trek was probably the better film, in the sense that there was better balance to it, it had all the elements you want, in satisfying quantity and quality... but I can't say I'm overly interested in seeing it in the cinema again. I might watch it on DVD with a friend (I have quite a large HD TV with blu-ray player so it's not that I'm really damning it to TV) but I don't feel a need to pay €10 to see it. I absolutely want to see Transformers: ROTF in the cinema again. On the other hand I've given it a lower rating. At the end of the day, as excellent as it was, Star Trek just wasn't as fun a film. That's how they compare for me anyway.
Course if I was comparing Chris Pine to Shia LeBeouf we would have an outright winner...
um....
...took a while to find that photo...
...what was I talking about again?
Anyway, as always, let me know your own comments!
8.5/10
Thursday, 18 June 2009
Friday, 22 May 2009
Night At The Museum 2: Battle Of The Smithsonian (2009)
I saw Night At The Museum 2 at a Saturday morning preview. It was early. Well, early for me. Fortunately this meant that the theatre was not full, so I could sit in the middle of the theatre AND away from the families, but still not too close to the screen. Score.
It wasn't really worth it though.
I honestly can't remember when I saw the first Night At The Museum. I think it might have been on the plane but I really don't know. Actually I remember so little about it that I think I might have liked it, at least a bit. I mean I don't remember hating it and to do like Ben Stiller...
So, I thought I'd go see Night At The Museum 2 anyway. I thought it might jog my memory. It didn't. But I do know what I thought of this one.
Ah no, it's not that bad. It's fine. It's just not really that exciting. I can't help but think that with the cast it has it really should have been excellent... and it wasn't. Not by a long shot. Ok, Hank Azaria was great as usual, and Ben Stiller and Owen Wilson were both perfectly comfortable in their roles. Everybody else was pretty much in the background for me.
Plotwise and actionwise it just wasn't up to much... I just kept thinking that it desperately needed to be in 3D. I mean ok, if Scar 3D taught me anything it's that 3D can't save a crappy film. But I do think it could help a middling movie, and that's what this is. I don't even think there was much in it for kids. Ok, I'm not a kid, but I've seen a lot of kids films and I always got the impression that they needed to be bright and funny and action filled, they need characters that kids can relate to. There's not much of that here really.
The best thing about the film was the Smithsonian itself. Actually it was like watching a long ad for the Smithsonian... I'm definitely going to go to the Smithsonian if I ever get to the US. I really think 3D could have helped here too... the exhibits could have really come to life then!
All in all, it was a bit meh. On the other hand I did think the museum looked fantastic and I did laugh a couple of times. I wasn't bored by it so I'm giving it a half decent rating...
6.5/10
It wasn't really worth it though.
I honestly can't remember when I saw the first Night At The Museum. I think it might have been on the plane but I really don't know. Actually I remember so little about it that I think I might have liked it, at least a bit. I mean I don't remember hating it and to do like Ben Stiller...
So, I thought I'd go see Night At The Museum 2 anyway. I thought it might jog my memory. It didn't. But I do know what I thought of this one.
Ah no, it's not that bad. It's fine. It's just not really that exciting. I can't help but think that with the cast it has it really should have been excellent... and it wasn't. Not by a long shot. Ok, Hank Azaria was great as usual, and Ben Stiller and Owen Wilson were both perfectly comfortable in their roles. Everybody else was pretty much in the background for me.
Plotwise and actionwise it just wasn't up to much... I just kept thinking that it desperately needed to be in 3D. I mean ok, if Scar 3D taught me anything it's that 3D can't save a crappy film. But I do think it could help a middling movie, and that's what this is. I don't even think there was much in it for kids. Ok, I'm not a kid, but I've seen a lot of kids films and I always got the impression that they needed to be bright and funny and action filled, they need characters that kids can relate to. There's not much of that here really.
The best thing about the film was the Smithsonian itself. Actually it was like watching a long ad for the Smithsonian... I'm definitely going to go to the Smithsonian if I ever get to the US. I really think 3D could have helped here too... the exhibits could have really come to life then!
All in all, it was a bit meh. On the other hand I did think the museum looked fantastic and I did laugh a couple of times. I wasn't bored by it so I'm giving it a half decent rating...
6.5/10
Wednesday, 13 May 2009
Star Trek (2009)
I saw this about a week an half before it came out... What would have been useful for people would have been if I reviewed it then. Unfortunately I'm pretty lazy... but at least you're getting it eventually, right?? On with the show.
This Star Trek is actually the 11th film in the franchise, this is of course in addition to the 5 TV series and various video games associated with it. In case you never realised, Star Trek is kind of a big deal.
Marketing types would have you believe that J.J. Abrams is kind of a big deal too. Personally I could take or leave... well, mostly leave, all of his TV ventures and I had pretty much written him off. Then I saw Cloverfield. To my surprise, I really liked Cloverfield. Even now I still think about it - no mean feat for a popcorn movie. Mind you, sometimes what I think about it is how it made me feel so terribly ill... but sure, at least I'm thinking about it. So when I heard that J.J. was doing the new Star Trek film I was... curious. I'd have watched a lot of Star Trek on TV over the years but the only ST film I really liked was Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. They just never looked that interesting... but a J.J. Abrams one? Well ok.
So it was with these things in mind that I went along to the blue carpet premiere in Dublin. I mention this because one of the things I've noticed is that a movie always seems better when it's free. Also, when you see it with 700 or so other people who are also seeing it for free, that makes it better too. So anyway, sat down in the theatre, Rick O'Shea said hi and had a chat with a dressed up Trekker, they gave out some prizes. Stage set. But was this going to turn out like Indiana Jones? I mean I liked Indiana Jones but I know a lot of people were annoyed about it.
Opening scene. Awesome. And I don't use that word often. Though I will say, I did think the Romulan ship looked a bit like the Shadow ships in Babylon 5. Not that it matters, I'm just saying in case anyone else thought the same - did you? Anyway, a great start to a great film. Star Trek (11) is a success in many different ways; it has an interesting plot, it makes good use of the main characters, it's appropriately funny, there are some great action scenes, my favourite Star Trek character is well represented (and that is important - to me as it will be to many people, albeit they may have different favourites - like I said, Star Trek is kind of a big deal.), the effects are great... what more do you want?
I've heard some people saying the plot is a bit confusing, I didn't think it was but to be honest, it hardly matters at all. This film is just a great ride. Now's probably a good time to mention Chris Pine. That man is going to be all over the place soon. Right now, I would watch him in anything and I'd say I'm not the only one. Leaving Mr. Pine aside, everyone else is strong as well. I had been worried about how Simon Pegg was going to fit into a Hollywood blockbuster. It turns out he fitted in just fine. I could go on but tbh just take it that I recommend this film to anyone who's interested in eating a load of popcorn and seeing an excellent summer(ish) blockbuster film. It's great.
If you don't want to eat a load of popcorn, or even see an excellent summer(ish) blockbuster film, then don't go to Star Trek. I'm a great believer in people watching films that work for them. Just because I say it's a great film doesn't mean everyone should watch. Just like not everyone should watch the fantastic film, Crank. Watch films that you feel you will appreciate. If you absolutely hate sci-fi or you want a film that you can think about, don't go see Star Trek and moan about how everyone was saying it was great but you didn't like it. It wasn't made for you. If you don't mind sci-fi and you just want to be entertain then definitely, go and see it. Go and see it now.
I'm starting to realise that this is a very long review but I still feel the need to ramble a little while longer... I just wanted to make something utterly clear. While I think this was a highly entertaining film, it'll never be a cult classic for me. It's great fun, it'll make stars out of some of the cast and undoubtedly it will rejuvenate the Star Trek franchise... but at the heart of it, it's candy. There's no meat to it, there's no real emotion, there's nothing beyond the sparkle it'll put in your eye for those couple of hours. I had a great time at the premiere but after, I went home to the real world. The old Star Trek had its roots there.
9/10
This Star Trek is actually the 11th film in the franchise, this is of course in addition to the 5 TV series and various video games associated with it. In case you never realised, Star Trek is kind of a big deal.
Marketing types would have you believe that J.J. Abrams is kind of a big deal too. Personally I could take or leave... well, mostly leave, all of his TV ventures and I had pretty much written him off. Then I saw Cloverfield. To my surprise, I really liked Cloverfield. Even now I still think about it - no mean feat for a popcorn movie. Mind you, sometimes what I think about it is how it made me feel so terribly ill... but sure, at least I'm thinking about it. So when I heard that J.J. was doing the new Star Trek film I was... curious. I'd have watched a lot of Star Trek on TV over the years but the only ST film I really liked was Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. They just never looked that interesting... but a J.J. Abrams one? Well ok.
So it was with these things in mind that I went along to the blue carpet premiere in Dublin. I mention this because one of the things I've noticed is that a movie always seems better when it's free. Also, when you see it with 700 or so other people who are also seeing it for free, that makes it better too. So anyway, sat down in the theatre, Rick O'Shea said hi and had a chat with a dressed up Trekker, they gave out some prizes. Stage set. But was this going to turn out like Indiana Jones? I mean I liked Indiana Jones but I know a lot of people were annoyed about it.
Opening scene. Awesome. And I don't use that word often. Though I will say, I did think the Romulan ship looked a bit like the Shadow ships in Babylon 5. Not that it matters, I'm just saying in case anyone else thought the same - did you? Anyway, a great start to a great film. Star Trek (11) is a success in many different ways; it has an interesting plot, it makes good use of the main characters, it's appropriately funny, there are some great action scenes, my favourite Star Trek character is well represented (and that is important - to me as it will be to many people, albeit they may have different favourites - like I said, Star Trek is kind of a big deal.), the effects are great... what more do you want?
I've heard some people saying the plot is a bit confusing, I didn't think it was but to be honest, it hardly matters at all. This film is just a great ride. Now's probably a good time to mention Chris Pine. That man is going to be all over the place soon. Right now, I would watch him in anything and I'd say I'm not the only one. Leaving Mr. Pine aside, everyone else is strong as well. I had been worried about how Simon Pegg was going to fit into a Hollywood blockbuster. It turns out he fitted in just fine. I could go on but tbh just take it that I recommend this film to anyone who's interested in eating a load of popcorn and seeing an excellent summer(ish) blockbuster film. It's great.
If you don't want to eat a load of popcorn, or even see an excellent summer(ish) blockbuster film, then don't go to Star Trek. I'm a great believer in people watching films that work for them. Just because I say it's a great film doesn't mean everyone should watch. Just like not everyone should watch the fantastic film, Crank. Watch films that you feel you will appreciate. If you absolutely hate sci-fi or you want a film that you can think about, don't go see Star Trek and moan about how everyone was saying it was great but you didn't like it. It wasn't made for you. If you don't mind sci-fi and you just want to be entertain then definitely, go and see it. Go and see it now.
I'm starting to realise that this is a very long review but I still feel the need to ramble a little while longer... I just wanted to make something utterly clear. While I think this was a highly entertaining film, it'll never be a cult classic for me. It's great fun, it'll make stars out of some of the cast and undoubtedly it will rejuvenate the Star Trek franchise... but at the heart of it, it's candy. There's no meat to it, there's no real emotion, there's nothing beyond the sparkle it'll put in your eye for those couple of hours. I had a great time at the premiere but after, I went home to the real world. The old Star Trek had its roots there.
9/10
Saturday, 9 May 2009
Crank: High Voltage (2009)
--** This blog has moved to www.averagefilmreviews.com, so if you like what you read then please come over and have a look! You can read all the old reviews over there including this one for Crank: High Voltage. You can of course continue reading this article here though. **--
After watching Crank the other week, I was really looking forward to Crank: High Voltage. Crank was one of the maddest films I'd ever seen... it wasn't THE maddest film; I'd have to review the IMDb list to be sure but The Spirit, which I saw earlier this year, is definitely a contender; but it was pretty mad nonethless...
The review for Crank was pretty short so I'm gonna keep this one short too. Again, it's not really worth worrying about spoilers when it comes to Crank films, so I'll tell you a little about it. If you recall, that mad day he had did not end well for our friend Chev Chelios. Luckily for us, he got better and now, a few months later, he's well up for sorting out the problems that have befallen him. There's no point in saying much more about the plot except that it is reasonably well thought out, as was the plot of the first film, but it's completely irrelevant. Basically someone has stolen Chev's heart and replaced it with a battery powered one. So obviously Chev's pissed about that and is on the rampage trying to get it back.
I would say that you should watch Crank before watching Crank: High Voltage. Most of the characters from Crank make a reappearance and there are a few flashbacks so it might be a bit confusing if you haven't seen it. That said, maybe you'd just appreciate it on a different level if you haven't. I don't know. I'm in two minds about it actually, because I didn't like Crank: High Voltage as much as Crank and I don't know if that's because I already knew pretty much what it was about.
Crank was so crazy and so different, Crank: High Voltage is crazy and different too but in the same way. They do ramp it up a bit, a lot actually, and I did appreciate that and I did really enjoy it, but at the end of the day it's the same thing. Also I think keeping the characters didn't really help it. They did bring in a couple of new ones but they seemed to try to mix all the old ones in as well. There were just too many in end. I think they could've taken out some of the scenes with the old ones and developed a couple of the new ones a bit more and it would have been better off for it. Could have made it a bit more interesting. In fact I do think they wasted Bai Ling a bit, her character could definitely have perked things up.
That said, it was still a great film and if you loved Crank you should definitely go see. If you hated Crank then there's absolutely no point in watching this one. In fact why are you even reading this review? This is not the film for you!
I'm gonna give this an 8. Maybe I'm just being a bit moan-y because it really was great fun but I thought Crank was near perfect for the kind of film it was and I was hoping that the follow up would be too.
8/10
After watching Crank the other week, I was really looking forward to Crank: High Voltage. Crank was one of the maddest films I'd ever seen... it wasn't THE maddest film; I'd have to review the IMDb list to be sure but The Spirit, which I saw earlier this year, is definitely a contender; but it was pretty mad nonethless...
The review for Crank was pretty short so I'm gonna keep this one short too. Again, it's not really worth worrying about spoilers when it comes to Crank films, so I'll tell you a little about it. If you recall, that mad day he had did not end well for our friend Chev Chelios. Luckily for us, he got better and now, a few months later, he's well up for sorting out the problems that have befallen him. There's no point in saying much more about the plot except that it is reasonably well thought out, as was the plot of the first film, but it's completely irrelevant. Basically someone has stolen Chev's heart and replaced it with a battery powered one. So obviously Chev's pissed about that and is on the rampage trying to get it back.
I would say that you should watch Crank before watching Crank: High Voltage. Most of the characters from Crank make a reappearance and there are a few flashbacks so it might be a bit confusing if you haven't seen it. That said, maybe you'd just appreciate it on a different level if you haven't. I don't know. I'm in two minds about it actually, because I didn't like Crank: High Voltage as much as Crank and I don't know if that's because I already knew pretty much what it was about.
Crank was so crazy and so different, Crank: High Voltage is crazy and different too but in the same way. They do ramp it up a bit, a lot actually, and I did appreciate that and I did really enjoy it, but at the end of the day it's the same thing. Also I think keeping the characters didn't really help it. They did bring in a couple of new ones but they seemed to try to mix all the old ones in as well. There were just too many in end. I think they could've taken out some of the scenes with the old ones and developed a couple of the new ones a bit more and it would have been better off for it. Could have made it a bit more interesting. In fact I do think they wasted Bai Ling a bit, her character could definitely have perked things up.
That said, it was still a great film and if you loved Crank you should definitely go see. If you hated Crank then there's absolutely no point in watching this one. In fact why are you even reading this review? This is not the film for you!
I'm gonna give this an 8. Maybe I'm just being a bit moan-y because it really was great fun but I thought Crank was near perfect for the kind of film it was and I was hoping that the follow up would be too.
8/10
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Just click...
